Initial diagnostics determined that the device was required to be returned to the bench for investigation.The device was returned to a philips bench repair facility and where the device and the units ecg functions were working satisfactorily however physical damage was observed on the front case requiring replacement.This was not related to the reported malfunction and was investigated and the device repaired (refer to (b)(4).Testing and verification on the device was completed satisfactorily and the device was returned to service at the customer site.Further investigation of this reported malfunction found the issue to be associated with the mounted cradle (serial number (b)(6) where replacement would be followed up with the relevant sales representative.Based on the information available and testing conducted, the cause of the reported problem was the mounted cradle the reported problem with the device was not confirmed.Based on the information available, no further action is necessary at this time.A review of the risk management file was performed, and the severity of this complaint is considered s0, the potential severity of s2 was identified in the risk document.The device was confirmed to be operating per specifications and no failure was identified.The investigation concludes that no further action is required at this time.If additional information is received the complaint file will be reopened.
|