STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH RESTORATION GAP II ACET SHELL; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 2082-0056R |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Fracture (1260); Loss of Osseointegration (2408)
|
Patient Problems
Fall (1848); Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Pain (1994); Ambulation Difficulties (2544); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 03/24/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
This pi for revision : son of patient stated his mother had primary right hip surgery on (b)(6) 2022.On (b)(6) 2022 patient experienced increase pain and x-rays confirmed a 1/2 inch wide break.It was also stated that on (b)(6) 2022 a "cage was added" due to her implant "popping out" twice.Son did not confirm what was popping out.A revision was then performed on (b)(6) 2023; "head and cup" were replaced with competitor products.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reported event: an event regarding crack/fracture involving an unknown hip was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.Product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient's hip was revised following a reported "break." the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as return of the device, pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
This pi for revision.Son of patient stated his mother had primary right hip surgery on (b)(6) 2022.On (b)(6) 2022 patient experienced increase pain and x-rays confirmed a 1/2 inch wide break.It was also stated that on (b)(6) 2022 a "cage was added" due to her implant "popping out" twice.Son did not confirm what was popping out.A revision was then performed on (b)(6) 2023; "head and cup" were replaced with competitor products.Update: on (b)(6) 2023 the patient was revised due to aseptic loosening of the acetabular component and acetabular bone loss resulting in pelvic discontinuity whereby all components were explanted and a custom tri-flange competitor construct was implanted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event regarding loosening, periprosthetic fracture and crack/fracture involving a restoration shell was reported.The loosening and periprosthetic fracture events were confirmed via clinician review of the provided medical records.Crack/fracture was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "conclusion/assessment: there was a revision surgery performed for acetabular loosening and bone loss with a pelvic discontinuity.The reconstruction was performed with a gap cup and the stem retained.There were subsequent dislocations and eventual failure of the reconstruction cage with dislocation and metallic implant fracture (by description).The hip was re-revised to a triflange construct and new modular stem.No radiographs were provided for review.Event confirmation: failure of a gap cup reconstruction can be confirmed.Root cause: the root cause was trauma combined instability and pelvic discontinuity." product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there has been 1 other similar event for the lot referenced which relates to loosening and periprosthetic fracture for the same device/patient; therefore, no further trending is required for this commonality.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to aseptic acetabular loosening, pelvic discontinuity, and device fracture.A review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "conclusion/assessment: there was a revision surgery performed for acetabular loosening and bone loss with a pelvic discontinuity.The reconstruction was performed with a gap cup and the stem retained.There were subsequent dislocations and eventual failure of the reconstruction cage with dislocation and metallic implant fracture (by description).The hip was re-revised to a triflange construct and new modular stem.No radiographs were provided for review.Event confirmation: failure of a gap cup reconstruction can be confirmed.Root cause: the root cause was trauma combined instability and pelvic discontinuity." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|