• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH OMNIFIT HFX HIP STEM SIZE #08 127; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH OMNIFIT HFX HIP STEM SIZE #08 127; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number 6076-0830A
Device Problem Loss of Osseointegration (2408)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Event Date 05/02/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient's right hip was revised due to pain.Surgeon's original plan was to convert the patient's hemi hip to a total hip by revising the unipolar component.However, when he tapped on the component, the stem came out of the patient's femur.All components were revised with stryker acetabular components and competitor femoral components.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding loosening involving an omnifit stem was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: the reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs show a recently explanted stem with blood and tissue visible on the trunnion and stem neck.The device appears otherwise unremarkable.Clinician review: a review of medical records with a clinical consultant indicated " this patient underwent revision surgery for a painful right hip arthroplasty.At the time it was felt that the pain was due to the unipolar replacement of the acetabulum but at the time of surgery the femoral component was found to be loose.I can confirm that the patient had a right hip arthroplasty but i have no other information to confirm the revision.The root causes of pain from a unipolar hip arthroplasty and loose femoral stem are multifactorial including surgical technique, especially achieving stable and satisfactory initial fixation, patient factors including bmi, activity level and quality of acetabular bone especially if arthritic change was already present or secondarily developed.Nothing in the history provided would suggest any causality to the implant itself." product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that during conversion surgery from hemi to total, intraoperatively, the stem was observed to have loosened.The reported devices were not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs show a recently explanted stem with blood and tissue visible on the trunnion and stem neck.The stem appears otherwise unremarkable.A review of medical records with a clinical consultant indicated " this patient underwent revision surgery for a painful right hip arthroplasty.At the time it was felt that the pain was due to the unipolar replacement of the acetabulum but at the time of surgery the femoral component was found to be loose.I can confirm that the patient had a right hip arthroplasty but i have no other information to confirm the revision since i have no office notes or operation reports for postoperative radiographs.The root causes of pain from a unipolar hip arthroplasty and loose femoral stem are multifactorial including surgical technique, especially achieving stable and satisfactory initial fixation, patient factors including bmi, activity level and quality of acetabular bone especially if arthritic change was already present or secondarily developed.Nothing in the history provided would suggest any causality to the implant itself." the exact cause of the event could not be determined.Further information such as office notes, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.The following devices were also listed in this report: device name#unitrax c-taper sleeve +0mm ; cat#6942-7-065 ; lot#86473801.Device name#unitrax modular endo head 48mm ; cat#6942-5-048 ; lot#7a1jta.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.H3 other text : device not returned to the manufacturer.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OMNIFIT HFX HIP STEM SIZE #08 127
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
arokiya raj
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key17011849
MDR Text Key316100648
Report Number0002249697-2023-00589
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDI
UDI-Device Identifier07613327023572
UDI-Public07613327023572
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K031744
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/26/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number6076-0830A
Device Catalogue Number6076-0830A
Device Lot NumberLV4W34
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/02/2023
Initial Date FDA Received05/26/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/02/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight64 KG
-
-