• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL MITRACLIP G4 CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM (MDD); MITRAL VALVE REPAIR DEVICES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL MITRACLIP G4 CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM (MDD); MITRAL VALVE REPAIR DEVICES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CDS0705-XTW
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Vascular Dissection (3160); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Event Date 04/17/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
B5: the malfunction reported in the article is captured under a separate medwatch report.B3: date of event was estimated.D4: lot numbers were not provided.D6a: date of implant was estimated.Details are listed in the attached article titled, "spontaneous healing of iatrogenic left atrial dissection: a rare complication of mitraclip therapy." the clip remains in patient.The device will not be returned for evaluation.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
This is filed to report vascular dissection that required medication as intervention.It was reported that a patient presented with heart failure due to massive atrial functional mitral regurgitation, a large coaptation gap, flattened anterior mitral leaflet (aml), a tethered posterior mitral leaflet (pml), and a history of chronic atrial fibrillation.Due to high-surgical risks, a mitraclip procedure was performed.Both leaflets were grasped with an xtw clip.Grasping was noted to be difficult due to a large coaptation gap which was caused by a flattened aml and hamstringing of a tethered pml.After several attempts with independent grasping, the clip was inverted and pulled back to the left atrium from the left ventricle, the clip delivery system (cds) was posteriorly bent and the clip unintentionally contacted the posterior left atrial wall.Transesophageal echocardiography (tee) revealed a banding structure attached to the left atrium, suggesting iatrogenic la dissection (latd).After the successful clip procedure, toe confirmed no further complications.The patient had an uneventful clinical course under an anticoagulation therapy with warfarin (therapeutic range of prothrombin time- international normalized ratio, 2.0¿2.6).Follow-up toe after 6 months showed spontaneous healing of the iatrogenic latd.The potential risk of device contact with the la wall due to unintentional remaining forces in clip-delivery systems requires more attention to prevent this phenomenon, especially in cases with challenging morphologies for mitraclip therapy.Details are listed in the attached article titled, "spontaneous healing of iatrogenic left atrial dissection: a rare complication of mitraclip therapy.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B5: the malfunction/ product problem reported in the article was captured under a separate medwatch report (report ref #: 2135147-2023-02365-00) in error and is now combined in this report.B3: date of event was estimated.D4: lot numbers were not provided.D6a: date of implant was estimated.The device was not returned for analysis.The lot history record (lhr) review and complaint history review were not performed because this incident was based on an article review and no lot information was provided.Based on available information, the reported difficult or delay positioning (leaflet grasping) was due to challenging anatomy.A cause of the reported unintended movement associated with the posterior bending could not be determined.The reported tissue injury (left atrial dissection) was due to the unintended movement.The reported patient effect of tissue injury, as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported medication required was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.H6 health effect - clinical codes 3160 was removed b5: the malfunction/ product problem reported in the article was captured under a separate medwatch report (report ref #: 2135147-2023-02365-00) in error and is now combined in this report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP G4 CLIP DELIVERY SYSTEM (MDD)
Type of Device
MITRAL VALVE REPAIR DEVICES
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, REG # 3005070406
3885 bohannon drive
menlo park CA 94025
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key17030180
MDR Text Key316293591
Report Number2135147-2023-02366
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P100009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/10/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberCDS0705-XTW
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/10/2023
Initial Date FDA Received05/31/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/19/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/10/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
STEERABLE GUIDE CATHETER
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-