B3 - date of event is estimated.D6 - the implant date is estimated.D4 - the udi number is not known as the part and lot numbers were not provided the device was not returned for analysis.The lot history record (lhr) review was not performed because this incident was based on an article review and no lot information was provided.Additionally, the complaint history review was not performed because this incident was based on an article review and no lot information was provided.Based on available information, the reported pain was due to the clip embolizing into the right common iliac artery bifurcation.The reported embolism/embolus (surgical procedure) associated with the clip embolizing into the right common iliac artery bifurcation was due to the clip detaching from the posterior leaflet (after slda).The reported unspecified tissue injury associated with the small chordae rupture appears to be due to the clip detaching from its implanted location.The cause of the reported expulsion associated with the clip detaching and being freed in anatomy, and the cause of the reported incomplete coaptation (intraprocedure) associated with the slda, could not be determined.The reported dyspnea appears to be due to the recurrent severe mr.The cause of the reported mitral valve insufficiency/ regurgitation (recurrent mr) could not be determined.The reported patient effects of mitral regurgitation, tissue injury, embolism, dyspnea, and pain, as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported hospitalization, unexpected medical interventions, and removal of foreign body were results of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.Attachment: article titled ¿mitraclip single-leaflet detachment and consequent migration in atrial functional mitral regurgitation".
|
This will be filed to report a single leaflet device attachment (slda) and a complete clip detachment (ccd).It was reported that a mitraclip procedure was performed to treat functional regurgitation mr grade 4.The first clip was deployed successfully.It was noted that after deployment of the second clip, the clip detached from the anterior leaflet and remained attached to the posterior leaflet (single leaflet device attachment/slda).No further treatment was provided and the procedure was concluded with a resulting mr of grade 3.Two weeks after being discharged, the patient was readmitted for inguinal pain and aggravated dyspnea.A transthoracic echocardiogram was performed and revealed recurrent mr and a small chordal rupture.An x-ray was performed and found the clip completely detached from the leaflets.A subsequent computed tomography was performed and found the clip embolized in the right common iliac artery.A percutaneous procedure was performed to retrieve the clip and a subsequent secondary mitraclip procedure was performed to treat the recurrent mr with a grade of 4.One additional clip was implanted and the procedure was concluded with a resulting mr of grade 2-3.Additional information can be found in the attached article, titled "mitraclip single-leaflet detachment and consequent migration in atrial functional mitral regurgitation.".
|