Catalog Number 80202 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Overheating of Device (1437); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 05/09/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the popliteal artery, after the first aspiration in the lesion, the catheter was flushed properly.It was further reported that during the second aspiration, the temperature of the catheter allegedly rose.Furthermore, the tip of the catheter was allegedly found to be deformed upon removal.Reportedly, the catheter was removed completely without any head detachment.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical sample was not returned for evaluation.A physical investigation was not possible.The user report and provided images contains information regarding helix break.After review of the provided images helix break can be confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported material deformation and overheating of device issues as no objective evidence was provided for review.However, the investigation is confirmed for the reported break issue.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the popliteal artery, after the first aspiration in the lesion, the catheter was flushed properly.It was further reported that during the second aspiration, the temperature of the catheter allegedly rose.Furthermore, the tip of the catheter was allegedly found to be deformed upon removal.Reportedly, the catheter was removed completely without any head detachment.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|