On (b)(6) 2023, the reporter (the niece) of the lay user/patient contacted lifescan (lfs) france, alleging that the patients onetouch verio 2 meter was reading inaccurately high compared to another meter.This complaint was classified based on information obtained from the customer care agent (cca) during the initial call.The reporter alleged that the issue started on (b)(6) 2023, at an unspecified time in the afternoon when the patient received a blood glucose reading of ¿310 mg/dl¿ on the subject meter.Less than 30 minutes later, the patient compared the reading to a blood glucose reading of ¿165 mg/dl¿ which she obtained on a contour plus meter.The patient manages her diabetes with a combination of medication (novo rapid insulin ¿ 8 units three times a day, abasaglar insulin ¿ 25 units in the evening, metformin 500 mg ¿ 1 pill in the afternoon, pravastatine 20 mg ¿ 1 pill in the evening, galvus 50 mg ¿ 1 pill twice a day) and the reporter claimed that she increased her abasaglar insulin with an extra dose in the evening on (b)(6) 2023, in response to the alleged issue.The reporter stated that the patient started feeling ¿dizzy and fainted¿ after the issue occurred on (b)(6) 2023, in the afternoon.The reporter informed the cca that the patient was transported to the hospital for unspecified medical treatment by an hcp on (b)(6) 2023, in the afternoon.During troubleshooting, the cca confirmed that the unit of measure was set correctly on the subject meter and the patient had used an approved sample site to obtain the blood samples.However, the cca established that the patient was not following the correct testing procedure by applying the same blood sample on both tests without washing her hands.The cca noted that the patient did not have control solution at the time of the call to test the subject system.Replacement products were sent to the patient.This complaint is being reported because the patient reportedly developed symptoms suggestive of a serious injury adverse event after taking an increased dose of insulin based on alleged inaccurate high results obtained with the subject meter.
|
The lay user/patient¿s meter has been returned and evaluated by lifescan product analysis with the following findings: the meter has passed performance testing with no faults found.The reported issue could not be confirmed.In addition, a device history record review was performed on the subject meter lot.The review did not identify anything that could adversely impact product performance or function.If lifescan obtains additional information regarding this complaint, a follow-up report will be submitted.At this time, lifescan considers this matter closed.
|