• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 12TLW805F35
Device Problem Inflation Problem (1310)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/17/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
One fogarty catheter was received by our product evaluation laboratory for a full examination.The report "balloon inflation difficulties" was confirmed.As received, the balloon was found to be ruptured at the central area and the distal ruptured edge was inverted to the distal side.After the distal ruptured edge was returned to the original position, the ruptured edges did not appeared to match at the ruptured location.Per the ifu "balloon rupture and catheter separation as a result of excessive pull force applied to remove adherent material are the most frequent causes of reported failures." and "to minimize the risk of vessel damage, balloon rupture, or tip detachment, do not exceed the maximum recommended inflation and pull force for each size catheter".No other visible damage was observed from the catheter body and windings.The through lumen was patent without any leakage or occlusion.An engineering investigation will be performed in order to consider any potential factors that may have contributed to this complaint.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.
 
Event Description
As reported, during use in patient with this fogarty catheter, the balloon could not be inflated in the patient's vessel anymore.The device was replaced by a new unit and the problem solved.There was no allegation of patient injury.The device was available for evaluation.Patient demographics unable to be obtained.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated section h6 (type of investigation), h6 (investigation findings) and h6 (investigations conclusions).The manufacturing records were reviewed for the lot involved and there is no indication of a related nonconformance.All process parameters were met and inspections passed successfully.As part of the manufacturing process a the units go through balloon and winding inspection process.Additionally a product risk assessment has been generated earlier.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
samantha eveleigh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492503939
MDR Report Key17104498
MDR Text Key316931721
Report Number2015691-2023-13602
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K193379
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/14/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number12TLW805F35
Device Catalogue Number12TLW805F35
Device Lot Number64332502
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/17/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/18/2023
Initial Date FDA Received06/12/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/07/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/14/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-