|
Model Number 778626 |
Device Problem
Biocompatibility (2886)
|
Patient Problem
Fever (1858)
|
Event Date 05/19/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the customer removed the ureteral stent (778626) from the packaging box during use.Before passing the stent through the guide wire, the customer pulled apart the wire and applied a gentle transverse pull force to the stent.The stent was ruptured and replaced with a new one (778626) to continue the procedure.After operation, the patient had a fever.Since the problem had occurred at the this hospital for the third time, the doctors¿ confidence in this product had been severely impacted.The hospital asked the company to explain about the stent ruptures and hopes the company to pay more attention to this.It was unknown what medical intervention was provided for the infection.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported event is inconclusive as no sample was returned for evaluation.Visual evaluation noted one photo sample received.Photo sample shows outer product packaging indicating product catalog number, lot number, and expiration date.The sample received cannot be evaluated for the reported event due to sample condition.Although an exact root cause could not be determined a potential root cause could be material selection.A dhr review did not show any problems or conditions that would have contributed to the reported event.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "precautions: the insertion of a ureteral stent should only be done by those individuals who have comprehensive training in the techniques and risks of the procedure.Potential complications: potential complications associated with retrograde/antegrade positioning of indwelling ureteral.Stents include the following: edema; stone formation; peritonitis; extravasation; ureteral reflux; stent dislodgement; fistula formation; loss of renal function fragmentation, migration, occlusion; hemorrhage; pain/discomfort; stent encrustation; hydronephrosis; perforation of kidney, renal; ureteral erosion; infection pelvis, ureter and/or bladder; urinary symptoms".H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: the actual/suspected device was inspected.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the customer removed the ureteral stent (778626) from the packaging box during use.Before passing the stent through the guide wire, the customer pulled apart the wire and applied a gentle transverse pull force to the stent.The stent was ruptured and replaced with a new one (778626) to continue the procedure.After operation, the patient had a fever.Since the problem had occurred at the this hospital for the third time, the doctors¿ confidence in this product had been severely impacted.The hospital asked the company to explain about the stent ruptures and hopes the company to pay more attention to this.It was unknown what medical intervention was provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|