Belated evaluation and reporting of this complaint was done during retrospective review as part of capa 20-0074 corrective action 6.The complaint is based on a misunderstanding.The customer assumed that the repair/exchange process provides that he will receive a new endoscope (i.E.A newly produced one and not one from the second-hand stock).He was therefore surprised to receive a device with the same serial number as the one he had previously sent in for repair.In fact, in case of repair, the customer will receive a similar/repaired one from the second-hand stock.In this case, the customer did receive the same serial number as an exchange; however, the repair process and the final inspection ensured that the customer received a refurbished and inspected device.Thus, a product related malfunction or a logistics issue could be excluded.The event is filed under internal karl storz complaint id (b)(4).
|