This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
It was reported by a healthcare professional in australia that during an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the hd arthroscope/sinuscope 4.0mm x 30 deg x 167mm (mitek lock) device was scratched and defective.It was further reported that it had foreign material shifting within the shaft, shadow/line forming on image and moved with tapping of the scope.It was unknown if and how the procedure was completed.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: three photos were returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.The depuy synthes mitek team conducted a visual inspection of the returned photos.Upon visual inspection of the first photo, an arthroscopic image was noted, the image appears to have a shadow.In the second photo marks of wear and sterilization were identified, as well as scratches.With the third photo was not possible to determine the damage in the distal end due to the image is blurry.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device, and no non-conformances were identified.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Based on the visual evaluation of the photos, this complaint can be confirmed, however the damage in the distal end could not be identified due to the photo provided does not contain enough evidence to determine a damage and consequently a root cause.Multiple factors are associated with this type of failure, the complaint device need to be physically evaluated in order to determine why the customer experienced the failure.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|