• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 15B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 15B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number LXMC15
Device Problems Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); Pain (1994)
Event Date 05/15/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 6/21/2023.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number 23895, and no related nonconformances were identified.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? when using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? how severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported dysphagia and abdominal pain? besides the reported dysphagia and abdominal pain, what was the reason for removal of the linx device? was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient was implanted with linx device lxmc15, lot number 23895 on (b)(6) 2019.After implant patient experienced progressive dysphagia and abdominal pain which started on (b)(6) 2022.Prior to explant of the device patient underwent medical testing of veg- (b)(6) 2023 - unremarkable; egd (b)(6) 2022- hill grade 1; bravo- negative cdms of 3.3.Patient had device explanted on (b)(6) 2023.No other linx device was implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 7/5/2023.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 7/25/2023.Investigation summary: two separated washers were observed during the visual assessment.Washers were observed with two welds tracks each and also on the bead cases where the washers were separated.This was likely due to forces applied during explant procedure.However, the separated washers didn¿t contribute to customer¿s experience.The visual analysis excepting the separated washers was consistent with an explanted device.Overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, some tooling marks were noted in some bead cases, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 15B
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4545 creek road
cincinnati OH
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
4545 creek rd.
cincinnati, OH 45242
3035526892
MDR Report Key17174631
MDR Text Key317637100
Report Number3008766073-2023-00105
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005356
UDI-Public00855106005356
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/26/2022
Device Model NumberLXMC15
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC15
Device Lot Number23895
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/12/2023
Initial Date FDA Received06/21/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/30/2023
07/24/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/05/2023
07/25/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/26/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight99 KG
-
-