• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION NEPHROMAX; CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION NEPHROMAX; CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Urinary Tract Infection (2120)
Event Date 05/01/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Block b3: date of event was approximated to (b)(6) 2023 based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.Block d4, h4: the complainant was unable to report the upn and lot number; therefore, the manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.Block h6: imdrf patient code e1310 captures the reportable event of urinary tract infection.Imdrf impact code f23 captures the reportable event of unexpected medical intervention.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a nephromax nephrostomy balloon catheter was used during a percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure performed on an unknown date.According to the literature, the patient underwent trans-scrotal percutaneous cystolitholapaxy through his existing foley catheter insertion site.He was taken to the operating room and placed in dorsal lithotomy position.His existing foley catheter was removed and a 0.035 sensor wire was passed through the existing tract into the bladder.A nephromax balloon was passed over a working wire and inflated to 16 atm for 5 min.Next, a 15 cm x 30 fr nephromax sheath was advanced over the balloon into the bladder followed by a rigid nephroscope immediately revealing the largest stone in the scrotal portion of the bladder.The stone was fragmented and removed with the aid of grasper devices and ultrasonic lithotripsy.Flexible cystoscopy then revealed a 1 cm stone in the pelvic portion of the bladder, which was removed intact with a basket.No other stones were visualized in the bladder.Fluoroscopy revealed no additional bladder stones; however, there was residual stone burden at the level of the prostatic urethra.Cystoscopic evaluation through the urethra revealed complete obliteration of the lumen at the level of the bulbar urethra.The access sheath was removed and a 20fr council-tip catheter was passed over the safety wire into the bladder.At this point the procedure was terminated, and the patient successfully extubated.The patient was discharged following the procedure.He was without further urinary tract infections and continued with monthly catheter exchanges for management of his lower urinary tract obstruction.He was last seen by urology three months post-operatively for inpatient catheter exchange during an admission for aspiration pneumonia, which unfortunately proved to be fatal.No further information has been obtained good faith efforts.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NEPHROMAX
Type of Device
CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC IRELAND LIMITED
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key17183283
MDR Text Key317725325
Report Number3005099803-2023-03225
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K121614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/26/2023
Initial Date FDA Received06/22/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age90 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-