Pma 510k #k163018.Device evaluation the zilbs-635-10-8 device of lot number c1943408 involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.The device evaluation could not be completed as the device or photographic evidence of the device was not returned for evaluation.Manufacturing records.Prior to distribution all zilbs devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.An nc code (gen-154) was noted on the work order but this unit was subsequently scrapped and could not have contributed to this issue.Review historical data: the review of relevant manufacturing records confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred for this work order.Instructions for use/label: there is no evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.It should be noted that the instructions for use (ifu0065) states the following: ¿inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred¿.Image review: an image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause of impact during transportation could be identified from the available information.The stent was found to be partially deployed when the user was unpacking the device.The user was asked if the red safety tab was present or had that also been dislodged but they could not recall.(ref att (b)(4).Add question regarding red safety tab).It is possible that impact received during transportation could have caused the red safety tab to be knocked out resulting in the stent becoming partially deployed.Another possible root cause could be attributed to incorrect handling of the device when the device was being removed from the packaging.The red safety tab could have accidentally been knocked off which could have led to the stent partially deploying.Confirmation of complaint: complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.Summary: according to the initial reporter, the stent was partially open when opening the package, another stent was placed to this patient.Confirmed quantity of 1 device, confirmed prior to use.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.This occurred prior to patient contact and another device was used to carry out the procedure.Investigation findings conclude definitive root cause could not be determined.Possible root causes could be attributed to impact during transportation or incorrect handling of the device when removing from the packaging, that possibly could have dislodged the red safety tab and resulted in the stent becoming partially deployed complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|