• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3300TFX
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Perivalvular Leak (1457)
Patient Problems Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 06/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10.Additional manufacturer narrative: the device was not returned for evaluation.Attempts to retrieve the device is in process.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification that a valve model 3300tfx25mm was explanted from the aortic position after an implant duration of approximately three (3) years and five (5) months due to transvalvular regurgitation observed preoperatively on transoesophageal echocardiography (toe).As reported, upon examination of the valve, the source of the leak could not be identified.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10.Additional manufacturer narrative: further information was received regarding the patient demographics, serial number and device availability.Due to some issues with the courier collecting the device, no sample for evaluation was received, therefore no product evaluation of the device could be performed by edwards.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification that a valve model 3300tfx25mm was explanted from the aortic position after an implant duration of approximately three (3) years and eleven (11) months due to transvalvular regurgitation observed preoperatively on transoesophageal echocardiography (toe).As reported, upon examination of the valve, the source of the leak could not be identified.A valve model 3300tfx23mm was implanted in replacement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated: b5 (describe event or problem), b6 (relevant tests/laboratory data, including dates), b7 (other relevant history), d9 (device availability), h3 (device evaluated by manufacturer), h6 (clinical code), h6 (type of investigation).Added: h6 (device code).Further information was received through investigation, and the device was also sent to our product evaluation laboratory for a full evaluation.Customer report of regurgitation could not be confirmed through visual observations.X-ray demonstrated wireform intact and a calcification nodule on the host tissue overgrowth encroaching over leaflet 1 on the inflow aspect.Minimal host tissue overgrowth encroached onto the tissue and into the orifice at the greatest distance of approximately 2 millimeters on leaflet 1 at the inflow aspect.Minimal host tissue overgrowth encroached onto the tissue and into the orifice at the greatest distance of approximately 3 millimeters on leaflet 1 at the outflow aspect.Host tissue overgrowth on the stent circumference was minimal at the outflow and inflow aspect.Sewing ring was cut off around the valve and fragments of the sewing ring were returned.The metal band was exposed around the inflow aspect of the valve due to the cut sewing ring.No visible inconsistencies were observed on the valve.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification that a valve model 3300tfx25mm was explanted from the aortic position after an implant duration of approximately three (3) years and eleven (11) months due to significant transvalvular regurgitation and mild to moderate paravalvular regurgitation observed preoperatively on transoesophageal echocardiography (toe).Reportedly, the leaflets appeared normal, thus the root cause of the regurgitation was unknown.As reported, upon examination of the valve, the source of the leak could not be identified.The patient presented with heart failure.A new valve was successfully implanted in replacement.The patient was noted as to be well and discharged home on post operative day 7.The explanted device was noted to be available for return.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification that a valve model 3300tfx25mm was explanted from the aortic position after an implant duration of approximately three (3) years and eleven (11) months due to severe transvalvular regurgitation and mild to moderate paravalvular regurgitation observed preoperatively on transoesophageal echocardiography (toe).Reportedly, the leaflets appeared normal, thus the root cause of the regurgitation was unknown.As reported, upon examination of the valve, the source of the leak could not be identified.The patient presented with heart failure.A new surgical valve was successfully implanted in replacement.The patient was noted as to be well and discharged home on post operative day 7.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Added information to section h6 (component code), h6 (type of investigation), h6 (investigation findings) and h6 (investigations conclusions) corrected data h6 (component code): "439 - cusp/leaflet" code removed.H3: evaluation summary: complaint of severe transvalvular regurgitation and mild to moderate paravalvular regurgitation was unable to be confirmed.Customer report of regurgitation could not be confirmed through visual observations.X-ray demonstrated wireform intact and a calcification nodule on the host tissue overgrowth encroaching over leaflet 1 on the inflow aspect.Minimal host tissue overgrowth encroached onto the tissue and into the orifice at the greatest distance of approximately 2mm on leaflet 1 at the inflow aspect.Minimal host tissue overgrowth encroached onto the tissue and into the orifice at the greatest distance of approximately 3mm on leaflet 1 at the outflow aspect.Host tissue overgrowth on the stent circumference was minimal at the outflow and inflow aspect.Sewing ring was cut off around the valve and fragments of the sewing ring were returned.The metal band was exposed around the inflow aspect of the valve due to the cut sewing ring.No other visible inconsistencies were observed on the valve.The sewing ring was completely removed from the valve.In the condition received, functional testing could not be performed.The observations seen from in vitro may be different from those obtained in vivo due to hemodynamic and environmental differences experienced while implanted, which were not present when the valve was returned to edwards h10: additional manufacturer narrative: regurgitation is considered to be a perivalvular leak (pvl) if a turbulent eccentric jet originates between the bioprosthetic sewing ring and the annulus.Pvl can occur in the mitral and aortic position for similar reasons.Technique related factors, such as incorrect valve sizing, have been shown to contribute to the development of pvl.Anatomical factors may create difficulty seating the bioprosthetic valve resulting in pvl.The anatomy of the annulus may induce mechanical stresses along the rigid bioprosthetic ring which can influence long-term valve performance and durability.A diseased or rigid annulus can potentially increase the mechanical stress on the prosthetic valve, leading to pvl.It is possible that mechanical stresses on the valve also contributed to the reported transvalvular leakage.Based on the information available, a definitive root cause was unable to be determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA EASE PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2 office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key17244840
MDR Text Key318284984
Report Number2015691-2023-14336
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P860057
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/15/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/09/2023
Device Model Number3300TFX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/13/2023
Initial Date FDA Received07/03/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/14/2023
08/23/2023
10/02/2023
11/22/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/09/2023
09/22/2023
10/17/2023
12/15/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/10/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-