• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V
Device Problem Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The customer reported to olympus that the uretero-renovideoscope experienced a collapsed image guide coil.It was unknown when the event was identified.There was no report of patient or user harm associated with the event.During testing and inspection of the returned device revealed that the forceps plug mouthpiece was scraped.This medical device report (mdr) is being submitted to capture the reportable malfunction found during device evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation.The customers¿ allegation of collapse, buckling, depression, scratch, cut, wrinkles of the insertion section was confirmed.The connecting tube had a specified dent.Additionally, during inspection and evaluation, olympus identified the forceps channel port was shaved, due to physical stress of the device.The following events were noted in the evaluation and are as follows: (a.) the distal end was burnt, (b.) the adhesive on the bending section cover, or distal end (a-rubber) had a chip, (c.) the universal cord had a scratch, (d.) the protector of universal cord on control section side had a cut, (e.) due to damage on channel tube, forceps cannot be inserted smoothly, this was due to buckling and deformation of the channel, (f.) the control unit, the grip, and the lock engagement lever had a scratch, (g.) the up down plate had discoloration, (h.) the angulation lever had a scratch, (i.) the insertion tube rotation ring had a scratch, (j.) the light guide connector had a scratch, (k.) the video cable had a scratch, (l.) the video connector had a scratch, (m.) and the video connector case had a scratch.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been over 14 years since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, the phenomenon could attributed due to stress of repeated use, external factors, or handling.The root cause of this event was unable to be identified.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8 061
JA  961-8061
Manufacturer (Section G)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8 061
JA   961-8061
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key17269667
MDR Text Key318885216
Report Number3002808148-2023-06764
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K072957
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/06/2023
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/06/2023
Initial Date FDA Received07/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/28/2008
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-