Patient admitted to hospital with syncope.12 lead ecg showed pauses.Then pacemaker was interrogated.It was noted that there was no high output/backup pacing with loss of capture on ventricular lead with capture control on.Capture control in ventricle was switched off, with fixed 3v at 1.0ms output.Patient is requested to return in 1 month for further analysis.Patient was monitored for 1 hour and then discharged.Device remains implanted.Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.
|
The pacemaker was not returned for analysis.The analysis is therefore based on the returned device data, as well as the inspection of the quality documents associated with the manufacture of this particular device.The manufacturing process for pacemaker was re-investigated and all production steps were performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process which may be related to the clinical observation.Available device data have been thoroughly analyzed, in particular the ecg of (b)(6) 2023, at 03:33 pm which documented ineffective right ventricular stimulation without backup stimulation.Based on all data available for analysis the exact root cause for the clinical observation could not be conclusively determined.However, it cannot be excluded that the clinical observation resulted from polarization artifacts of the ventricular lead.It was reported that the pacemaker was reprogrammed to capture control off with a fixed ventricular amplitude of 3.0 v at 1.0 ms.In summary, the device was not returned for analysis.The review of the quality documents confirmed a regular device manufacturing.The available data revealed that polarization artifacts from the ventricular lead most likely led to the clinical observation.
|