|
Model Number LEV2517-MVE |
Device Problem
Retraction Problem (1536)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 06/16/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A search for non-conformances associated with the reported part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was reported available for return for analysis, but has not yet been received; therefore, the alleged product issue cannot be confirmed at this time.If the device or additional information is received, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the physician was treating an aneurysm on the left internal carotid artery (ica).After treating the aneurysm with coils, the implantation of a lvis evo stent was planned.The stent was placed through a microcatheter when it needed to be repositioned, it was not possible to retract the stent into the microcatheter.The physician was able to remove the lvis stent and microcatheter together out of the patient and used a new set of lvis evo and microcatheter of the same size, and successfully completed the procedure with good results.No injury was caused and the patient is "doing well.".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: d10 (date device received), d11, h6, h10 (summary device evaluation).Summary of device evaluation: the microcatheter was the only item returned for evaluation.The investigation found the returned microcatheter flattened at 9cm from the distal tip.The flattened section of the microcatheter may have caused or contributed to the reported retraction issue; however, as the lvis evo stent system used during the procedure was not returned for evaluation, this investigation could not test or assess the interaction between the two devices and therefore, this complaint is considered non-verifiable.The physical evaluation of the microcatheter could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the damage, but the damage is consistent with the microcatheter experiencing forces over specification.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|