|
Model Number BG8795U |
Device Problems
Deflation Problem (1149); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 06/24/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # :(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported by the field, during a mechanical thrombectomy to the internal carotid artery (ica) for a cerebral infarction, an embotrap iii, embovac intermediate catheter and an emboguard 87, 95 cm balloon guide catheter (bg8795u, lot unknown) were used.Recanalization could not be achieved with standard method.The emboguard was relatively easily to insert to the lesion, but when aspirated from the emboguard, the shaft got crushed due to high thrombus volume.The shaft was flattened when the unspecified microcatheter (mc) was pulled out.Also, deflation was a bit slow and was difficult to remove the air, too.The procedure was completed with implanting unspecified the stents up to ica.There was no negative impact to the patient.A continuous flush was done.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Section b5: additional information received indicated that the emboguard used for direct aspiration.The deficiency is only alleged for emboguard.The balloon was deflated.The device was removed intact (in one piece) from the patient.Complaint conclusion: as reported by the field, during a mechanical thrombectomy to the internal carotid artery (ica) for a cerebral infarction, an embotrap iii, embovac intermediate catheter and an emboguard 87, 95 cm balloon guide catheter (bg8795u, lot unknown) were used.Recanalization could not be achieved with standard method.The emboguard was relatively easily to insert to the lesion, but when aspirated from the emboguard, the shaft got crushed due to high thrombus volume.The shaft was flattened when the unspecified microcatheter (mc) was pulled out.Also, deflation was a bit slow and was difficult to remove the air, too.The procedure was completed with implanting unspecified the stents up to ica.There was no negative impact to the patient.A continuous flush was done.Additional information received indicated that the emboguard used for direct aspiration.The deficiency is only alleged for emboguard.The balloon was deflated.The device was removed intact (in one piece) from the patient.The device was discarded; therefore, no further investigation can be performed.The lot number is not known; therefore, a device history record review cannot be completed.With the information available and without the product available for analysis, the reported customer complaints could not be confirmed.The exact cause of the event could not be determined; however, there are circumstances of the procedure that may have contributed to the reported failure.Per the instructions for use (ifu) the balloon deflation instructions are as follow: a.If using an lav: attach a 20ml syringe to the lav and apply vacuum until the balloon is fully deflated.B.If using a 3 way stopcock: turn the stopcock to allow flow to the 20ml syringe and apply vacuum until balloon is fully deflated.Turn stopcock to prevent flow to balloon.C.Ensure balloon is fully deflated before withdrawing the catheter.Different contrast media to heparinized saline ratios, other than the recommended ratio described, may affect device visibility and may impact the balloon deflation time.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the events were related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|