• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTAPRO; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTAPRO; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 3243
Device Problems Defective Device (2588); Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material (2944); Intermittent Loss of Power (4016)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/05/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that there was a foreign material contamination.A 1.25mm rotapro was noted to have a foreign material contamination during the procedure.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: b5 event description updated to add description of device not functioning.Correction: h6 device code added.Device evaluated by manufacturer: returned product consisted of the rotapro advancer.The burr catheter was not returned for analysis.The advancer, drive shaft, and handshake connection were visually and microscopically examined.Inspection of the device found that blood was present within the device.No forms of non-procedural matter were identified within the returned device that would suggest contamination.In order to determine the functionality of the returned device, the drive shaft was attempted to be rotated and was unable to rotate.When the rotapro advancer was connected to the rotapro console control system and the knob switch (ablation button) was pressed, the device stalled and would not run due to the presence of blood within the device.Product analysis did not confirm the reported contamination, as there were no non-procedural materials identified within the device that would suggest device contamination prior to usage within the procedure.The reported functionality issues were able to be confirmed, as the device stalled and would not run due to the presence of blood within the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that foreign material contamination occurred.A 1.25mm rotapro was noted to not function and to have foreign material contamination during the procedure.The procedure was completed with another 1.25mm rotapro.No patient complications were reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a device stall occurred.A 1.25mm rotapro was noted to stall during the procedure.The procedure was completed with another 1.25mm rotapro.No patient complications were reported.Additional information: there was no foreign material contamination noted as was originally reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction to b5 - update to incident description.Rewritten completely, as reported event changed via information provided by good faith efforts.Correction to h6 - correction coding, as reported event changed via information provided by good faith efforts.Based on the additional information received from the healthcare facility and results of the device analysis, this event no longer meets the criteria for a reportable event.It was originally reported that foreign material contamination occurred, however it was confirmed that the reported event was for a device stall, which does not meet the requirements for a reportable complaint.Stalling is a function to prevent patient injury.If the device is in a stall state, it is not operable and there is no risk to the patient and is unlikely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.Alternative therapies are available.Device evaluated by manufacturer: returned product consisted of the rotapro advancer.The burr catheter was not returned for analysis.The advancer, drive shaft, and handshake connection were visually and microscopically examined.Inspection of the device found that blood was present within the device.No forms of non-procedural matter were identified within the returned device that would suggest contamination.In order to determine the functionality of the returned device, the drive shaft was attempted to be rotated and was unable to rotate.When the rotapro advancer was connected to the rotapro console control system and the knob switch (ablation button) was pressed, the device stalled and would not run due to the presence of blood within the device.Product analysis did not confirm the reported contamination, as there were no non-procedural materials identified within the device that would suggest device contamination prior to usage within the procedure.The reported functionality issues were able to be confirmed, as the device stalled and would not run due to the presence of blood within the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTAPRO
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
rachel shields
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6512422111
MDR Report Key17337814
MDR Text Key319217017
Report Number2124215-2023-37641
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729893356
UDI-Public08714729893356
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/02/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number3243
Device Catalogue Number3243
Device Lot Number0030366477
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/27/2023
Initial Date FDA Received07/17/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/03/2023
09/21/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/01/2023
10/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/18/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-