|
Model Number 3243 |
Device Problems
Defective Device (2588); Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material (2944); Intermittent Loss of Power (4016)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 06/05/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was a foreign material contamination.A 1.25mm rotapro was noted to have a foreign material contamination during the procedure.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction: b5 event description updated to add description of device not functioning.Correction: h6 device code added.Device evaluated by manufacturer: returned product consisted of the rotapro advancer.The burr catheter was not returned for analysis.The advancer, drive shaft, and handshake connection were visually and microscopically examined.Inspection of the device found that blood was present within the device.No forms of non-procedural matter were identified within the returned device that would suggest contamination.In order to determine the functionality of the returned device, the drive shaft was attempted to be rotated and was unable to rotate.When the rotapro advancer was connected to the rotapro console control system and the knob switch (ablation button) was pressed, the device stalled and would not run due to the presence of blood within the device.Product analysis did not confirm the reported contamination, as there were no non-procedural materials identified within the device that would suggest device contamination prior to usage within the procedure.The reported functionality issues were able to be confirmed, as the device stalled and would not run due to the presence of blood within the device.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that foreign material contamination occurred.A 1.25mm rotapro was noted to not function and to have foreign material contamination during the procedure.The procedure was completed with another 1.25mm rotapro.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a device stall occurred.A 1.25mm rotapro was noted to stall during the procedure.The procedure was completed with another 1.25mm rotapro.No patient complications were reported.Additional information: there was no foreign material contamination noted as was originally reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction to b5 - update to incident description.Rewritten completely, as reported event changed via information provided by good faith efforts.Correction to h6 - correction coding, as reported event changed via information provided by good faith efforts.Based on the additional information received from the healthcare facility and results of the device analysis, this event no longer meets the criteria for a reportable event.It was originally reported that foreign material contamination occurred, however it was confirmed that the reported event was for a device stall, which does not meet the requirements for a reportable complaint.Stalling is a function to prevent patient injury.If the device is in a stall state, it is not operable and there is no risk to the patient and is unlikely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.Alternative therapies are available.Device evaluated by manufacturer: returned product consisted of the rotapro advancer.The burr catheter was not returned for analysis.The advancer, drive shaft, and handshake connection were visually and microscopically examined.Inspection of the device found that blood was present within the device.No forms of non-procedural matter were identified within the returned device that would suggest contamination.In order to determine the functionality of the returned device, the drive shaft was attempted to be rotated and was unable to rotate.When the rotapro advancer was connected to the rotapro console control system and the knob switch (ablation button) was pressed, the device stalled and would not run due to the presence of blood within the device.Product analysis did not confirm the reported contamination, as there were no non-procedural materials identified within the device that would suggest device contamination prior to usage within the procedure.The reported functionality issues were able to be confirmed, as the device stalled and would not run due to the presence of blood within the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|