The initial reporter stated they received discrepant results for 15 patient samples tested with the elecsys troponin t hs assay on a cobas e 801 analytical unit, serial number (b)(6).Of the data provided the following discrepant results for 5 patient samples are representative examples: on (b)(6) 2023, patient sample 1 initially resulted in troponin t hs value of 17.7 pg/ml and repeated as 83.2 pg/ml.After decantation and centrifugation, the sample was repeated twice, resulting in values of 16.9 pg/ml and 16.7 pg/ml.On (b)(6) 2023, patient sample 2 initially resulted in a troponin t hs value of 62.4 pg/ml.The sample was repeated three times, resulting in values of 50.4 pg/ml, 66.7 pg/ml and 68.1 pg/ml.On (b)(6) 2023, patient sample 3 initially resulted in a troponin t hs value of 47.5 pg/ml and repeated as 54.1 pg/ml on a second cobas analyzer.After decantation and centrifugation, the sample was repeated on the first analyzer resulting in a value of 56.1 pg/ml.On (b)(6) 2023, patient sample 4 initially resulted in a troponin t hs value of 474 pg/ml and repeated as 599 pg/ml.After decantation and centrifugation, the sample was repeated resulting in a value of 507 pg/ml.On (b)(6) 2023, patient sample 5 initially resulted in a troponin t hs value of 390 pg/ml on a second analyzer and repeated as 488 pg/ml on the first cobas analyzer.After decantation and centrifugation, the sample was repeated twice on the first analyzer resulting in values of 507 pg/ml and 508 pg/ml.For samples 1 and 2, no questionable results were reported outside of the laboratory.For samples 3, 4, and 5, it was asked but it is unknown if a questionable result was reported outside of the laboratory.
|
Calibration and quality control results were acceptable.There is no indication of a general instrument or reagent issue.The pre-analytical data show that the number of inversions of the tube and the centrifugation conditions were not adequate.Upon review of the alarm logs, multiple sample clot and sample foam alarms were observed.Camera images collected by the analyzer showed that there was film and particles present, indicating a sample quality issue.The investigation did not identify a product problem.The issue is consistent with a pre-analytical sample handling issue.
|