BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INTELLANAV STABLEPOINT OPEN-IRRIGATED; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, CARDIAC ABLATION, FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Lot Number 0030968576 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
Event Date 07/10/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a procedure an intellanav stablepoint open-irrigated was selected for use.A puncture into the femoral vein was performed along with a double transeptal puncture.Afterwards mapping of the left atrium (la) occurred with the catheter without issues.After ablation of the right pulmonary veins transeptal access was lost and another puncture had to be done.About thirty minutes later, with more ablations performed during that time, a blood pressure decrease was noticed in the patient.An echocardiogram was performed, and a pericardial effusion was confirmed and treated immediately with pericardiocentesis.About 60 applications of radio frequency (rf) energy were performed before the observed complication.No popping or drastic impedance drop was noticed during ablation, nor was any high contact force or excessive movement of the catheter or patient noticed.The cause of the pericardial effusion was unknown.The procedure was able to be completed.The patient was admitted to intensive care as a result of the effusion but was expected to fully recover.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The device has not been received for analysis; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a procedure an intellanav stablepoint open-irrigated was selected for use.A puncture into the femoral vein was performed along with a double transeptal puncture.Afterwards mapping of the left atrium (la) occurred with the catheter without issues.After ablation of the right pulmonary veins transeptal access was lost and another puncture had to be done.About thirty minutes later, with more ablations performed during that time, a blood pressure decrease was noticed in the patient.An echocardiogram was performed, and a pericardial effusion was confirmed and treated immediately with pericardiocentesis.About 60 applications of radio frequency (rf) energy were performed before the observed complication.No popping or drastic impedance drop was noticed during ablation, nor was any high contact force or excessive movement of the catheter or patient noticed.The cause of the pericardial effusion was unknown.The procedure was able to be completed.The patient was admitted to intensive care as a result of the effusion but was expected to fully recover.It was further reported that the catheter was at the left inferior pulmonary vein (lipv) when the pericardial effusion was noticed.A competitor company 8fr sheath was used with the catheter.The device is expected to be returned for analysis.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a procedure an intellanav stablepoint open-irrigated was selected for use.A puncture into the femoral vein was performed along with a double transeptal puncture.Afterwards mapping of the left atrium (la) occurred with the catheter without issues.After ablation of the right pulmonary veins transeptal access was lost and another puncture had to be done.About thirty minutes later, with more ablations performed during that time, a blood pressure decrease was noticed in the patient.An echocardiogram was performed, and a pericardial effusion was confirmed and treated immediately with pericardiocentesis.About 60 applications of radio frequency (rf) energy were performed before the observed complication.No popping or drastic impedance drop was noticed during ablation, nor was any high contact force or excessive movement of the catheter or patient noticed.The cause of the pericardial effusion was unknown.The procedure was able to be completed.The patient was admitted to intensive care as a result of the effusion but was expected to fully recover.It was further reported that the catheter was at the left inferior pulmonary vein (lipv) when the pericardial effusion was noticed.A non-bsc company 8fr sheath was used with the catheter.It was indicated that the facility shipped the device to boston scientific for analysis, however the device was lost in transit.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional device information updated.Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The device has not been received for analysis; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|