• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE TIBIAL DIAPHYSEAL REPLACEMENT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE TIBIAL DIAPHYSEAL REPLACEMENT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_STM
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem Ambulation Difficulties (2544)
Event Date 06/26/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported device is similar to a device approved for compassionate use in the united states.It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.H3 other text : device remains implanted.
 
Event Description
As reported: "this lady had this custom, joint sparing diaphyseal replacement.The junction has failed.Both components are osseo-integrated." right tibia.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding disassociation involving a midshaft tibia replacement, tibial component was reported.The event was confirmed via clinician review of the provided x-ray images.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device remains implanted.-clinician review: a review of the provided x-rays by clinical consultant indicated: "this patient underwent a custom articular sparing diaphyseal replacement of the tibia.Approximately 19 years later one of the components of the implant has failed.Although no revision was mentioned this will most likely be necessary.I can confirm that the patient had this custom prosthesis since i was able to see the x-ray.I do see a small abnormality on lateral view but i cannot confirm exactly what part has failed.The root cause of this event cannot be determined with absolute certainty.The causes of mechanical failure of a mega/replacement prosthesis are multifactorial including surgical technique and assembly, patient factors including activity level and bmi, and implant factors.Failure of this type of implant 19 years after implantation in a young patient would not be an unusual phenomenon." -product history review: review of the product history records indicate device was manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient is planned to be revised due to disassociation of the custom midshaft tibia.A review of the provided x-rays by clinical consultant indicated: "this patient underwent a custom articular sparing diaphyseal replacement of the tibia.Approximately 19 years later one of the components of the implant has failed.Although no revision was mentioned this will most likely be necessary.I can confirm that the patient had this custom prosthesis since i was able to see the x-ray.I do see a small abnormality on lateral view but i cannot confirm exactly what part has failed.The root cause of this event cannot be determined with absolute certainty.The causes of mechanical failure of a mega/replacement prosthesis are multifactorial including surgical technique and assembly, patient factors including activity level and bmi, and implant factors.Failure of this type of implant 19 years after implantation in a young patient would not be an unusual phenomenon." additional information including operative reports, pathology reports, progress notes, and return of the device are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
 
Event Description
As reported: "this lady had this custom, joint sparing diaphyseal replacement.The junction has failed.Both components are osseo-integrated." right tibia.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TIBIAL DIAPHYSEAL REPLACEMENT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE
210 centennial avenue
centennial park, elstree
borehamwood WD6 3 SJ
UK  WD6 3SJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE
210 centennial avenue
centennial park, elstree
borehamwood WD6 3 SJ
UK   WD6 3SJ
Manufacturer Contact
arokiya raj
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key17348252
MDR Text Key319379378
Report Number3004105610-2023-00067
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/30/2005
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_STM
Device Lot NumberPIN 11236
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/26/2023
Initial Date FDA Received07/19/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/22/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/23/2004
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age42 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-