During an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure, the physician used a cook acrobat 2 calibrated tip wire guide.It was reported that the tip of the wire guide broke off during the procedure and the tip remained in the patients duodenum.The physician decided to leave the fragment to pass naturally and no further procedures will be needed.The tip of the wire guide remained inside the patient¿s body and the physician decided to leave the fragment.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
Pma/510(k) # k172665 investigation evaluation: our evaluation of the product said to be involved confirmed the report.The device returned with the wire guide reinserted into the racetrack with a clear liquid in the bag and the contents of the return wet.The detached portion was not included in the return.Based on the product specification and the product returned the detached portion is estimated to be less than 3 mm.The remaining portion of the wire guide is within specifications for tip length and total length, the complaint is confirmed based on the exposed metal at the distal tip and the statements describing the event.No other anomalies were detected with the device.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A nonconformance that could potentially be related to the complaint was contained in the associated dhr.The nonconformance documentation supports the affected device(s) were dispositioned appropriately prior to release of this lot.There is no evidence nonconforming product was released for distribution.In an effort to heighten awareness of the potential connection of the customers report to the current manufacturing processes production personnel were notified.Investigation conclusion: our laboratory evaluation confirmed that the coating of the wire guide was damaged at the distal tip.A definitive cause for this observation could not be determined because the actual use conditions could not be duplicated in the laboratory setting.Due to a variety of clinical conditions such as patient anatomy, endoscope position or progression of disease state, we could not reproduce the actual conditions of product usage during our laboratory analysis.This limits our ability to conclusively determine a cause.If additional pressure is applied to the wire guide and/or accessory device(s) while moving the wire guide inside the accessory device(s), this could contribute to wire guide coating damage.Prior to distribution, all acrobat® 2 calibrated tip wire guides are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|