It was reported that, after a thr surgery, the patient fell and dislocated their hip, so a revision surgery had to be performed.A 42/28mm or30 head and 54mm or30 liner were exchanged for a 40mm anteverted liner and a 40mm oxinium head with a plus 8 taper.The patient has a history of various falls and revision surgeries.They were reported to be stable on the table.
|
Section h3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, as of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation including x-rays, the operative report or surgical technique has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have definitively contributed to the event.The patient impact is ¿the patient fell and dislocated their hip,¿ and a revision was performed.It was communicated, the patient was stable on the table, however the patient¿s current health status is unknown.Therefore, no further medical assessment can be rendered.Device specific identifiers were not provided.Therefore, an evaluation of the manufacturing records, complaint history review, instructions for use, risk management file and prior actions review could not be performed.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include traumatic injury, patient anatomy, postoperative care or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|