Device evaluation: upon receipt to nuvasive a visual inspection of the rod was conducted.It was visually confirmed that the rod was broken on the housing body side.It was also observed that the rod was partially distracted with deep scoring marks on the distraction rod.Functional testing was attempted but the rod would not distract.X-rays of the rod do not show any clear component failure, however, it was noted that there was uneven spacing between the distraction rod and housing tube.It is likely that the scoring was a result of the distraction rod rubbing against the threaded cap.For the threaded cap to score the distraction rod external bending force would need to be applied to the actuator.Due to these external bending forces, the distraction rod became scored.It is also possible that exposure to excessive or repeated loading resulted in an unstable construct.Therefore, it is unknown but likely that after implantation, patient activity or weight, could have exceeded loads of the device.Device record review: a review of the device history record (dhr) indicates the rod was manufactured to all specified requirements at the time and met all the required inspections prior to shipment.
|