• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION Back to Search Results
Lot Number VMFC300323
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Defective Device (2588); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Material Deformation (2976); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/03/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a versacross connect access solution was selected for use during a watchman case.During the procedure, the mechanical guidewire was inserted into superior vena cava.Then, the versacross connect dilator snapped into watchman sheath and inserted over the mechanical guidewire into svc.Once trying to withdraw the mechanical guidewire to exchange it, it did not come off from the veracross dilator, since it was very tight.The physician felt like the mechanical guidewire was getting caught while withdrawing.Thus, the entire system was removed from the patient's body.Once out, the mechanical guidewire was with the insulation peeling back, and had been stripped off (at proximal end and distal end), and confirmed kinked.Therefore, the versacross kit was replaced.No patient complications were reported.The procedure was completed successfully.The devices are expected to be returned for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The devices have not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This is supplemental mdr to report investigation results (mdr aware date 11dec2023).The device was returned for analysis.The reported allegation was confirmed.It was noted during investigation that the mechanical guidewire (mgw) was stuck in the vxa dilator.The mgw remained in one piece, the external coil is not broken.However, the mgw core is fractured at the distal end, the distal j-shape is not maintained.The measurement of the mechanical guidewire outer diameter (mgw od) shows no feature notable deformation.It was revealed that the mgw od merriments are within drawing specifications.The mgw od near the proximal end, proximal to wire kink and distal to wire kink respectively.A significant coating loss can be noted along the mgw in proximity of wire kinks.The mgw wire pass test was performed on the vxa dilator revealing no difficulties in loading and withdrawing the mgw within the vxa dilator.Therefore, the hyptoube is not deformed.During high magnification imaging measurement, no sign of significant ovalization on the vxa dilator tip was noted, but it was noted the that the tip material from the vxa dilator is taken off by the mgw passing.Therefore, material build up can be expected within the lumen further restricting inner diameter during wire passage.It was noted that the lumen of the vxa dilator experienced material loss, the ro coil is not fully axially aligned, and the hypotube distal end does feature a chamfer and did not present an edge prone.This product is part of the 97072033-fa epflex guidewire obstruction advisory commencement advisory for the j-tipped mechanical guidewires.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a versacross connect access solution was selected for use during a watchman case.During the procedure, the mechanical guidewire was inserted into superior vena cava.Then, the versacross connect dilator snapped into watchman sheath and inserted over the mechanical guidewire into svc.Once trying to withdraw the mechanical guidewire to exchange it, it did not come off from the veracross dilator, since it was very tight.The physician felt like the mechanical guidewire was getting caught while withdrawing.Thus, the entire system was removed from the patient's body.Once out, the mechanical guidewire was with the insulation peeling back, and had been stripped off (at proximal end and distal end), and confirmed kinked.Therefore, the versacross kit was replaced.No patient complications were reported.The procedure was completed successfully.The devices are expected to be returned for analysis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION
Type of Device
DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC.
5959 trans-canada highway
montreal H4T 1 A1
CA  H4T 1A1
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC.
5825 explorer drive
mississauga, on L4W 5 P6
CA   L4W 5P6
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
dc a330
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key17400361
MDR Text Key320238104
Report Number2124215-2023-39276
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRE
UDI-Device Identifier00685447012597
UDI-Public00685447012597
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K220414
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/19/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Lot NumberVMFC300323
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/03/2023
Initial Date FDA Received07/26/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/11/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/19/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/03/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-