• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 X-PORT ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 X-PORT ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 7707540J
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Difficult to Remove (1528); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/21/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that thirteen years and five months post port placement.When the port system was attempted to be removed, it was allegedly difficult to remove the catheter.It was further reported that when the removed catheter was checked, the surface of the catheter was uneven and rough.Reportedly, there was no breakage of the catheter and no remains in the patient's body.Furthermore, the port and the catheter was removed.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the x-port isp implantable port, groshong single-lumen, 8f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the x-port isp implantable port, groshong single-lumen, 8f are identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2012).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the x-port isp implantable port, groshong single-lumen, 8f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the x-port isp implantable port, groshong single-lumen, 8f are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one x-port implantable port attached to a groshong catheter was returned for evaluation.Gross visual, microscopic, tactile and functional testing were performed.During microscopic evaluation, degradation was noted throughout the catheter and the catheter was noted to be rough to the touch.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the identified degraded issue.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported difficult to remove and deformation issue, as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event cannot be verified from the returned physical sample.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2012).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that thirteen years and five months post port placement, when the port system was attempted to be removed, it was allegedly difficult to remove the catheter.It was further reported that when the removed catheter was checked, the surface of the catheter was uneven and rough.Reportedly, there was no breakage of the catheter and no remains in the patient's body.Furthermore, the port and the catheter was removed.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Event Description
It was reported that thirteen years and five months post port placement, when the port system was attempted to be removed, it was allegedly difficult to remove the catheter.It was further reported that when the removed catheter was checked, the surface of the catheter was uneven and rough.Reportedly, there was no breakage of the catheter and no remains in the patient's body.Furthermore, the port and the catheter was removed.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the x-port isp implantable port, groshong single-lumen, 8f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the x-port isp implantable port, groshong single-lumen, 8f are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one x-port implantable port attached to a groshong catheter was returned for evaluation.Gross visual, microscopic, tactile and functional testing were performed.During microscopic evaluation, tissue adhesion was noted throughout the catheter and the catheter was noted to be rough to the touch.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the identified deformation and patient device interaction issue.However, the investigation is inconclusive for difficult to remove as the conditions of use (device implanted for over 13 years) could not be recreated.It was reported that the device was implanted for more than thirteen years.Therefore, it is possible that the length of the implant contributed to the removal difficulties and the tissue adhesion along the length of the catheter.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2012), g3.H11: h6 (device, result).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
X-PORT ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key17404034
MDR Text Key320588961
Report Number3006260740-2023-03212
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741098246
UDI-Public(01)00801741098246
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K022983
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/04/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number7707540J
Device Lot NumberRETI1081
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/04/2023
Initial Date FDA Received07/27/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/13/2023
01/04/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/13/2023
01/04/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2009
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-