This will be filed to report material deformation.It was reported that a mitraclip procedure was performed to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) grade 4.One clip was successfully deployed on the mitral valve.A second clip was advanced, and the leaflets were grasped.Upon starting the deployment sequence, the lock line was unable to be removed.The physician decided to continue with the deployment of the clip.However, it was then observed the clip arms jumped open.Therefore, the physician decided to remove the clip.While attempting to remove the clip delivery system (cds) it was noted the clip was unable to be retracted into the steerable guide catheter (sgc).The decision was then made to remove both the sgc and cds at the same time.Upon removal, it was observed the septum was damaged and the soft tip of the sgc was deformed.The physician stated the damage to the septum was caused by both the sgc and cds.One additional clip was then deployed on the mitral valve, reducing mr to a grade of 1-2.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure and no additional information was provided.
|
The returned device analysis confirmed the reported deformation due to compressive stress associated with the soft tip deformation.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to the reported event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints from the lot.All available information was investigated and the reported deformation due to compressive stress (soft tip deformation) is related to procedural conditions associated with the open clip getting pulled forcefully in attempts to get it into the sgc and how the open clip was removed with the sgc simultaneously from the patient.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|