It was reported that, after a right bhr-tha surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2005, the patient fell on weekend, resulting in a femur peri-prosthetic fracture.This adverse event was treated by performing a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, in which the size 15 synergy stem was explanted along with a 62 mm birmingham cup.A redapt stem and a r3 cup were placed in exchange.Patient's current health status is unknown.
|
H3, h6: the devices were not returned for evaluation; therefore, devices analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, as of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the event.It is noted the patient fell, resulting in a femur peri-prosthetic fracture.The patient had a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023.The patient impact beyond the peri-prosthetic fracture and revision cannot be determined with the limited information reported.Devices specific identifiers were not provided.Therefore, an evaluation of the manufacturing records, complaint history review, instructions for use, risk management file and prior actions review could not be performed.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the products failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include traumatic injury, patient bone quality or patient condition.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|