• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RED72SDKIT
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/09/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned red72 confirmed a fracture near the hub, underneath the strain relief.If the device is mishandled during manipulation against resistance, damage such as a fracture may occur.Due to the fracture, the device could not be functionally tested, and the root cause of resistance during the procedure could not be determined.Further evaluation revealed a kink on the catheter shaft.This damage was likely incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred during return to penumbra.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72), a sendit delivery device (sendit), and a non-penumbra sheath.It was reported that the patient¿s anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the red72 and the sendit were flushed and soaked in saline prior to use.The physician advanced the red72 and sendit to the target location.When the physician attempted to retract the sendit, the sendit would not move as it was stuck in the red72.The physician fractured the red72 at the strain relief below the proximal hub when attempting to remove the sendit.The red72 and the sendit were removed from the patient.The procedure was completed using another red72, a penumbra system red 43 reperfusion catheter (red43), and the same sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key17446136
MDR Text Key320436259
Report Number3005168196-2023-00367
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948025943
UDI-Public815948025943
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K211654
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,08/02/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRED72SDKIT
Device Lot NumberF00006385
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/18/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/27/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/14/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age74 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-