The root cause and root cause sub class cannot be identified.There was limited device-specific information provided, not batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number or a return sample, a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality-related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety request investigation.The manufacturing operation employ quality control procedures, which include in- process testing, thermal testing, and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the packaged product.This is an adverse event for a burn of the product.A risk calculation cannot be determined as there is no reasonable suggestion of a device malfunction.
|
On 17-jul-2023, a spontaneous report from the united states was received via email regarding a female consumer (age not provided) who used an unspecified thermacare heat wrap.On an unspecified date in (b)(6) 2023, the consumer topically applied a thermacare heat wrap for her sciatica.After wearing the product just over an hour, the heat wrap burnt her skin.She had blisters that had droplets of water in them.The next day upon awakening, she had a rash with blisters.
|