• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORNIER INC UNKNOWN PERFORM REVERSED BASEPLATE; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORNIER INC UNKNOWN PERFORM REVERSED BASEPLATE; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_WTB
Device Problem Osseointegration Problem (3003)
Patient Problems Stroke/CVA (1770); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Event Date 06/14/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device will not be returned.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.H3 other text : device disposition is unknown.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2023, a revision surgery took place, utilizing the blueprint planning feature (case id: (b)(4)).The attached blueprint planning report outlines the details of the procedure.Subsequent to the surgery, a stroke occurred in the patient.It is postulated that the patient's arm underwent pulling forces by hospital staff during transfers, resulting in complications.Consequently, both the baseplate and sphere became dislodged from their intended positions.In response to this incident, the decision was made to extract and replace the baseplate, screws, and sphere (perform reversed).The original ascend flex stem remained in situ, while the tray and poly (tornier flex) were substituted.Notably, no x-rays were taken; rather, a blueprint ct scan was employed.No exceptional circumstances, such as additional trauma, underlying medical conditions, or issues like delayed or non-union, were identified in relation to the aforementioned event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event was confirmed through the evaluation of a medical expert.Since data was provided, the opinion of a medical expert was sought and stated as follows: «yes, i belief pulling the patients arm may have been a contributing factor in this event, especially if it involved the paralytic arm, where the muscles would not be able to guard the joint.The blueprint images show from the glenoid bone imprint of the baseplate, that the baseplate was atypically positioned relatively superiorly and posteriorly, possibly making the initial fixation less optimal.» more detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the exact root cause of the complaint event.A possible root cause, as noted by the medical expert review, of less-than-optimal position of the prosthesis during implantation can be assessed from the provided blueprint images.A review of the device history was not possible because the lot number was not communicated.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Indications of material, manufacturing, or design related problems were unable to be identified as the catalog number and lot number were not communicated.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Event Description
On 14-jun-2023, a revision surgery took place, utilizing the blueprint planning feature (case id: (b)(4)).The attached blueprint planning report outlines the details of the procedure.Subsequent to the surgery, a stroke occurred in the patient.It is postulated that the patient's arm underwent pulling forces by hospital staff during transfers, resulting in complications.Consequently, both the baseplate and sphere became dislodged from their intended positions.In response to this incident, the decision was made to extract and replace the baseplate, screws, and sphere (perform reversed).The original ascend flex stem remained in situ, while the tray and poly (tornier flex) were substituted.Notably, no x-rays were taken; rather, a blueprint ct scan was employed.No exceptional circumstances, such as additional trauma, underlying medical conditions, or issues like delayed or non-union, were identified in relation to the aforementioned event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN PERFORM REVERSED BASEPLATE
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORNIER INC
10801 nesbitt avenue s
bloomington MN 55437
Manufacturer (Section G)
TORNIER INC
10801 nesbitt avenue s
bloomington MN 55437
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key17469209
MDR Text Key320485991
Report Number0001649390-2023-00180
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/30/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_WTB
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/11/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/07/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/04/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/30/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-