Model Number 3300TFX |
Device Problems
Perivalvular Leak (1457); Device Stenosis (4066); Central Regurgitation (4068)
|
Patient Problems
Dyspnea (1816); Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446)
|
Event Date 07/12/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient with a 25mm 3300tfx aortic valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 6 years, 1 month due to stenosis.The patient presented with sob.The procedure was performed successfully with a 23mm 9750tfx transcatheter valve.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The subject device is not available for evaluation, as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Updated sections: b5, b7, g3, g6, h6 health effect - clinical code, device code(s), and type of investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported and learned through medical records that a patient with a 25mm 3300tfx aortic valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 6 years, 1 month due to increasing gradients, severe stenosis, moderate regurgitation and pvl.The patient presented with acute systolic heart failure, nyha 111, sob and fatigue.The procedure was performed successfully with a 23mm 9750tfx transcatheter valve with no complications.The patient was taken to the recovery room in stable condition.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Updated sections: d4 expiration date, g3, g6, h4, h6 type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions.The device history record was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Stenosis, which develops progressively over time, can be due to a number of issues.Additionally, there can be a number of potential known and unknown patient related contributing factors.Structural valve deterioration (svd) is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explants and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, non-calcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly, may contribute to stenosis and/or regurgitation.Alternatively, nonstructural dysfunction (nsvd) may also play a role in the development of valvular stenosis.Regurgitation is considered to be a perivalvular leak (pvl) if a turbulent eccentric jet originates between the bioprosthetic sewing ring and the annulus.Pvl can occur in the mitral and aortic position for similar reasons.In the early postoperative period, the highest incidence of pvl has been seen in patients developing infective endocarditis, which is most likely attributed to inadequate peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis or nosocomial infection.Annular calcification is also a risk factor for the development of peri-operative pvl as the bioprosthesis may not seat properly after debridement.Technique related factors, such as incorrect valve sizing, have been shown to contribute to the development of pvl.Anatomical factors may create difficulty seating the bioprosthetic valve resulting in pvl.The anatomy of the annulus may induce mechanical stresses along the rigid bioprosthetic ring which can influence long-term valve performance and durability.A diseased or rigid annulus can potentially increase the mechanical stress on the prosthetic valve, leading to pvl.A definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined; however, patient factors likely caused or contributed to the event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|