The device was returned, and an initial evaluation was conducted by olympus; however, investigation is ongoing.During the initial evaluation, the user¿s report was confirmed.There were stains in the image during testing.Additionally, as noted in b5, the unit had undergone insufficient reprocessing as foreign material was found in the forceps channel.The unit also had peeling adhesive, scratching, corrosion, and general chipping present throughout the device.Following the confirmed reprocessing failure, olympus personnel sent the user facility a reprocessing questionnaire.Through the questionnaire, the user facility confirmed all reprocessing steps in accordance with the instructions for use (ifu).If additional information becomes available following the device evaluation, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
This report is being supplemented to provide information that was inadvertently left out of the initial medwatch and to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.The device met all specifications at the time of shipment.It has been over a year since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the legal manufacturer's investigation, the foreign material could not be identified.Hence, a conclusive root cause could not be determined.The suggested event is preventable by handling the scope in accordance with the following sections of the instructions for use: chapter 5 safety for cleaning, disinfection and sterilization chapter 6 application and condition of cleaning, disinfection and sterilization chapter 7 cleaning, disinfection and sterilization procedures per the legal manufacturer, the other device defects included in the initial medwatch have no potential to cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunctions were to recur.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
|