E1 - initial reporter facility name: (b)(6).Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.A visual examination identified that the main coil was kinked and detached at the zap tip section and it was observed stretched and bent at the coil arm section.Under the microscope it was observed that the main coil was kinked and detached at the zap tip section, and it was observed stretched and bent at the coil arm section.The functional inspection could not be performed, because only the main coil was returned.Dimensional inspection revealed that the coil arm and primary coil outer diameter passed the required specification.
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 17jul2023.It was reported that the coil could not be pushed out of the microcatheter.The target lesion was located in the splenic artery.A 22mm x 60cm interlock was selected for use for embolization with 18 other coils.During the procedure, the third 22mmx60cm coil was pushed out, after it was advanced half of the non boston scientific microcatheter.However, the resistance became larger and it could not be pushed out.In order to ensure the successful completion of the procedure, a new microcatheter and a new coil of the same model were used to continue the procedure.The device was successfully deployed and the procedure was successfully completed.No complications were reported and the patient was stable post procedure.However, device analysis revealed that the main coil was detached at the zap tip section.
|