• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD. MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD. MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 125
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 07/12/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2023, apifix was notified that patient (b)(6) is scheduled for revision (surgery) to a new apifix device on 01-aug-2023.Reason for revision implant breakage.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Production process analysis: a review of the device history record confirmed that the device was manufactured and tested according to relevant procedures, and shipped according to manufacturer's specifications.User (surgeon and patient) information analysis: patient (b)(6) index procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2019.On (b)(6) 2023, apifix was notified that patient (b)(6) is scheduled for revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023 to a new apifix device.Due to implant breakage.On (b)(6) 2023 apifix was notified that the patient underwent the revision in which a new mid-c rod and apifix screw were replaced.Patient x-rays from before and after the revision were provided.No report of patient harm/complications was receieved.The device will not be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation risk assessment: implant breakage can result from trauma, practicing contact or high demand sports, hyper-kyphosis, inserting the pedicle screws in a wrong trajectory which locks the poly-axial joints, not working according to the surgical technique (e.G., minimally invasive approach and/or not using the trial tool properly).The risk for breakage due to the above increases when the implant reaches its maximal elongation.Reoperation events are a known risk that was assessed and recorded by the product risk management file.The risk of broken rod has been assessed and found to be acceptable the current implant breakage rate due to any reason is in line with the rate reported in the literature for this type of complication as described in the company's cer (clinical evaluation report).The risk has been quantified, characterized, and documented as acceptable within a full risk assessment.If new pertinent information comes to light, then a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 125
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel st.
yokneam ellit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel st.
yokneam ellit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
alan vaisman
1 hacarmel st.
yokneam ellit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key17486397
MDR Text Key320672822
Report Number3013461531-2023-00030
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIS
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/09/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMID-C 125
Device Catalogue NumberAFS-125-040
Device Lot NumberAF-10-01-17
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/12/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/09/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/06/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age17 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-