The reported event could be confirmed since images of ct scans shows loosening of the tibial component and a non-union of a medial malleolar fracture.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed: ¿the ct scan shows a non-union of a medial malleolar fracture.The tibial component has migrated, ¿flipping¿ over backwards due to significant anterior subsidence/bone loss.The implant is definitively loose.There is bone adherence to the adaptis layer, yet this bone is loose from the tibial bone.No signs of loosening of the talar component.I conclude the primary root cause is a user-related issue, and possible secondary factors such as bone quality, are patient related.It is difficult to assess the influence of secondary factors in this case.¿ based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a user related issue.Due to a mix-up in central sterilization, the wrong prophecy guides were used during the primary surgical procedure which resulted in a medial malleolar fracture with insertion of the tibial component.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|