VOLCANO CORPORATION VISIONS PV .035 DIGITAL IVUS CATHETER; CATHETER, ULTRASOUND, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 88901 |
Device Problem
Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/18/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This complaint was reviewed and investigated according to the manufacturer¿s policy.Block a2: date of birth not available.Blocks b6 & b7: no information available.Block c: not applicable for this device.Blocks d6 & d7: not applicable for this device.Blocks h3 & h6: the visions pv.035 catheter was not returned for evaluation, thus no returned product investigation was performed.Blocks h7 & h9: do not apply to this submission.Submission of this report does not, in itself, represent a conclusion by the manufacturer and/or authorized representative or the national competent authority that the content of this report is complete or accurate, that the medical device(s) listed failed in any manner and/or that the medical device(s) caused or contributed to an alleged death or deterioration in the state of the health of any person.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a visions pv.035 catheter was used in a therapeutic peripheral procedure in a moderately calcified proximal iliac vessel.Prior to use of the visions catheter, a balloon angioplasty, then stenting, followed by a post balloon angioplasty were performed.After, the visions catheter was used and during removal, it got caught in the patient anatomy and the distal tip separated.The separated portion was removed with a snare.Angiogram confirmed no piece was retained in the patient.The patient was discharged as expected with no injury reported.This adverse event and product problem is being submitted due to the tip separation, requiring intervention (snare).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block h3: the visions pv.035 catheter was returned without the distal portion (includes distal tip, distal fillet, and scanner body) of the catheter.The proximal portion (includes the proximal fillet, catheter shaft, y-connector, and a portion of the connector cable) that was returned measured approximately 89.6cm from its distal end to the y-connector.Visual inspection found that the catheter separated at the proximal fillet.The inner member broke within the proximal fillet, and was still attached to the polyamide.At the location of the separation (proximal fillet), no sharp edges were observed.It is likely that the distal portion measured approximately 1.9 cm (max.Spec) which is within the overall catheter working length (90 +/- 2.5 cm) when including the returned proximal portion of 89.6 cm.Block h6: the probable cause of the catheter separation is damage during use due to the device being caught on the patient anatomy, and required some degree of force to remove.Manipulation, strain, impact, and forces associated with use can also affect the integrity of the device.Submission of this report does not, in itself, represent a conclusion by the manufacturer and/or authorized representative or the national competent authority that the content of this report is complete or accurate, that the medical device(s) listed failed in any manner and/or that the medical device(s) caused or contributed to an alleged death or deterioration in the state of the health of any person.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|