An event regarding malposition involving an unknown shell was reported.The event was confirmed via clinician review of the provided medical records.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device remains implanted.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "document x-ray to pt xx.Jpg: this is a single x-ray image.The same dual geometry cup is present.It appears slightly vertical.There is no significant polyethylene wear noted on x-ray.The femoral component appears well fixed and well positioned.This patient underwent a cementless left total hip arthroplasty at some point in the past and then developed dislocation which required revision.I can confirm that the patient underwent a primary left total hip arthroplasty since i was able to review the x-rays.I cannot confirm that a revision was carried out since i have no supporting documentation, including office notes, operation notes, or post revision x-rays.The root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty.The causes of late total hip arthroplasty dislocation are multifactorial including surgical technique factors and patient factors including activity level and bmi.Implant factors can be considered if there was, for example, significant polyethylene wear which contributed to dislocation.Otherwise i would not attribute any cause to the implant itself.Late location most likely occurs when significant polyethylene wear occurs and/or patient soft tissues stretch, allowing dislocation." product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to dislocation of the head from the liner.The issue was addressed by explanting the head and the liner and cementing a new liner into the existing cup to alter the version.A review of the provided x-ray images indicated that the shell did appear "slightly vertical" but the dislocation event itself could not be confirmed as the x-rays did not display dislocation of the head/liner.It is likely that the mal-positioning of the shell caused or contributed to the subsequent dislocation.Further information such as device-identifying catalog and lot codes, additional pre- and post-operative x-rays and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.It should be noted that, although catalog numbers are unknown so surgical protocols/ifus could not be reviewed to confirm, cementing of a liner into the shell is generally considered an off-label application.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.H3 other text: device not returned to the manufacturer.
|