• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO ANNULOPLASTY RING; RING, ANNULOPLASTY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO ANNULOPLASTY RING; RING, ANNULOPLASTY Back to Search Results
Model Number 4450
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Mitral Valve Stenosis (1965)
Event Date 04/21/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: there is evidence of device-related harm or structural deficiency of the ring that could cause or contribute to a serious injury.This is considered a serious injury.The device was not returned for evaluation, as it remains implanted.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient with a 30mm 4450 mitral ring underwent a valve in ring procedure after an implant duration of 16 years, 2 months due to stenosis and regurgitation.The procedure was performed with a 26mm 9750tfx transcatheter valve.The patient was stable post procedure.The perceived root cause was device deterioration.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The causes of surgical or percutaneous intervention for failed annuloplasty repairs are well documented in the literature.This is primarily due to progression of native valvular disease or technical failures and is not related to device malfunction.This may present as recurrent regurgitation and/or stenosis.Unlike prosthetic heart valves, annuloplasty rings are an adjunct to the valve repair.Failed annuloplasty repair re-operations are primarily the result of a progression of disease, the patient's baseline hemodynamics, or technical failures and are not evidence of product malfunctions.The most likely cause is patient factors, including the progression of patient's disease and the implant duration over 10 years.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO ANNULOPLASTY RING
Type of Device
RING, ANNULOPLASTY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key17552708
MDR Text Key321221685
Report Number2015691-2023-15264
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K926138
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/07/2011
Device Model Number4450
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/21/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/15/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/18/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/01/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/08/2006
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Life Threatening; Hospitalization;
Patient Age91 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-