• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 120602F
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Our product evaluation lab received one 120602f catheter.The spring tip was stretched.Adhesive was visible at spring tip, indicating the spring was not broken.The balloon was completely torn at 0.02 inches from the proximal windings.The broken-off balloon with distal balloon windings were detached from the spring tip and were not returned.Per ifu, balloon rupture and catheter separation as a result of excessive pull force applied to remove adherent material are the most frequent causes of reported failures.To minimize the risk of vessel damage, balloon rupture, or tip detachment, do not exceed the maximum recommended inflation and pull force for each size catheter.The device history record review was completed and documented that the device met all specifications upon distribution.Report of the balloon tip broke was confirmed.An engineering evaluation has been initiated to assess for any manufacturing-related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a 120602f fogarty catheter balloon tip broke off when pulling it out of the leg.The balloon remained inflated when taking the clot out.The tip broke off, exposing the inner wire.There was no patient injury, and no additional procedures or imaging was required due to the product malfunction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Engineering evaluation was completed and concluded that a product risk assessment escalation was generated earlier to address balloon failures with fogarty embolectomy catheters.Corrections to the h6 codes investigation findings and investigation conclusions were made.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as a part of the monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER
Type of Device
FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
jessica atallah
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492500294
MDR Report Key17557187
MDR Text Key321270826
Report Number2015691-2023-15271
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103043273
UDI-Public(01)00690103043273(17)250605(11)230307(10)64889747
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PREAMENDMENT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number120602F
Device Lot Number64889747
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/09/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/26/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/16/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/21/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/27/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/07/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-