The healthcare facility reported this incident to the fda on 26th july 2023 and given the reference number: (b)(4).Please see below the response sent to the customer, "thank you for informing us of your customer complaint where a carbon sterile sm11p has broken during an arthroscopy procedure.With this blade breaking during the above procedure, we must report this to the relevant competent authorities as it falls into the category of an adverse incident.Thank you for returning the broken blade in question and the unopened sm11p from the same lot number for us to test.Firstly, we had to process the broken blade through our gamma irradiation facility to ensure it was safe to handle.We then checked the heat treatment hardness of the broken blade and the unused blade on our calibrated hardness testing machine where we achieved results of 837hv on both blades indicating they had been manufactured to our in-house tolerances and the surgical blade standard bs2982.Using the unused blade, we were then able to test the ductility on our automated load cell where we were able to achieve an acceptable bend.With this lot number, we have been able to check our in-process records for any recorded problems that could assist this complaint, and none could be found, we can also inform you that we have received no further customer complaints regarding blades breaking of which (b)(4) carbon sterile sm11p were produced and sold.Using the results from the above tests the only explanation we can offer is with this blade breaking during arthroscopy surgery if any excessive twisting or lateral pressure was applied in or around the joint this could have contributed to the blade breaking.If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.We have been unable to establish the root cause of this broken blade as we were unable to find fault with the broken blade in question and the sample blade.The only explanation we can offer is the one mentioned above.No corrective action is required as we were unable to find fault with the broken blade in question through our investigation.No preventive action is required as we were unable to find fault with the broken blade in question through our investigation.".
|