Only the pusher was returned for evaluation.The investigation of the returned pusher found the distal end to be damaged and broken with a chipped section at 9.0cm from the proximal marker band.The pusher was sent to a third-party metallurgical expert for scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive analysis of the observed break condition.The analysis suggests the unit broke due to a mechanical failure, which is consistent with the device experiencing forces over-specification.Secondarily, pitting/corrosion was observed on the pusher and was determined to have occurred after removal from the patient.The corrosion noted on the pusher is likely a result of disinfection, cleaning, and/or storage of the device after removal from the patient.The review of the provided medical imaging could not verify if the alleged pusher fragment separated and remained within the patient as described in the reported event; therefore, the full reported event could not be verified based on the known information.
|