• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ4LNG INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ4LNG INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33680014
Device Problems Off-Label Use (1494); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problems Limb Fracture (4518); Implant Pain (4561); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 07/21/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device will not be returned.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.H3 other text : device disposition is unknown.
 
Event Description
This event is reportable due to the product mix in the central sterile processing which resulted in the wrong guides being used in the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event was confirmed since images of ct scans shows loosening of the tibial component and a non-union of a medial malleolar fracture.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed: ¿the ct scan shows a non-union of a medial malleolar fracture.The tibial component has migrated, ¿flipping¿ over backwards due to significant anterior subsidence/bone loss.The implant is definitively loose.There is bone adherence to the adaptis layer, yet this bone is loose from the tibial bone.No signs of loosening of the talar component.I conclude the primary root cause is a user-related issue, and possible secondary factors such as bone quality, are patient related.It is difficult to assess the influence of secondary factors in this case.¿ based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a user related issue.Due to a mix-up in central sterilization, the wrong prophecy guides were used during the primary surgical procedure which resulted in a medial malleolar fracture with insertion of the tibial component.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Event Description
This event is reportable due to the product mix in the central sterile processing which resulted in the wrong guides being used in the patient.Two cases involving prophecy guides became mixed up in central sterilization.The first case appeared during surgery, and it was only when the tibial corner holes were drilled that the mistake became evident.The error was traced back to the mixing up of prophecy guides.The surgeon switched to standard instrumentation but inadvertently caused a medial malleolar fracture during the insertion of the tibial component, only detected six weeks later through x-rays.Despite the fracture, the patient chose non-surgical treatment due to work commitments, and the patient experienced relief from pain.Multiple discussions were held about potential revision, but the issue was attributed to technical errors rather than the implants themselves.An update on a later dat, clarified that the primary surgery for this patient is (b)(4), with pi# (b)(6) addressing the revision surgery/primary implants only, and pi# (b)(6) addressing the allegations of mixed up guides and the medial malleolar fracture.Feedback from the sales representative indicated that the mix-up was a result of a processing error in the sterilization department due to staffing shortages and the use of temporary staff.Additional information provided on a later date, confirmed that the guides from one patient were indeed used in another patient's surgery on the same day.The entire set of guides was placed incorrectly, staged for surgery.However, the guides from different cases were not mixed together.The mix-up occurred because the patient information labels on the guides were swapped.The process involved the sales representative delivering and filling out an intake form for the equipment brought in, with sterile processing handling the items and placing them on case carts for each surgery.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ4LNG INFINITY ADAPTIS
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key17561548
MDR Text Key321331562
Report Number3010667733-2023-00444
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00889797069694
UDI-Public00889797069694
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K131283
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number33680014
Device Lot Number1719296
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/21/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/16/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/27/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/25/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/17/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-