• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NAKANISHI INC. NSK; HANDPIECE, AIR-POWERED, DENTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NAKANISHI INC. NSK; HANDPIECE, AIR-POWERED, DENTAL Back to Search Results
Model Number EOM TITANIUM TURBINE X-SL
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem Skin Tears (2516)
Event Date 07/11/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On july 28, 2023, nakanishi received an e-mail from an oem about a malfunction of an nsk handpiece.The details nakanishi obtained are as follows: the event occurred on (b)(6) 2023.The dentist was performing a dental procedure on a patient using the eom titanium turbine x-sl handpiece (serial no.(b)(6)) and the led coupling (serial no.(b)(6)).The patient was not under anesthesia.During the procedure, the handpiece came out of the coupling and cut the inside of the patient's mouth.The dentist applied azunol ointment to the injury.The injury has healed normally without any need for additional medical treatment.According to the dentist, there were no abnormalities observed in the device prior to use.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in japan, but similar products are marketed in the us under k113655.The dentist refused to provide information about the patient's weight.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receiving the device involved in the mdr event, nakanishi conducted a failure analysis of the returned device [report no.(b)(4).].These activities are described in more detail below.Methodology used: a) nakanishi examined the device history record and the repair history for the subject eom titanium turbine x-sl device [a8y01425].There were no problems observed during manufacturing or testing noted in the dhr.The repair history showed 3 service records since the device was shipped.The repair details are as follows: october 2015: the cartridge was replaced.March 2020.The cartridge was replaced.April 2020.The device was overhauled.No components were replaced.With respect to the repairs in the above list, the service record indicate that nakanishi performed all of the necessary operation checks and confirmed that all of the criteria were met.B) nakanishi performed a manual reproducibility test.There was no problem connecting the returned handpiece with the led coupling [serial no.(b)(6)] returned together with the handpiece.Nakanishi then pulled the handpiece by hand from the coupling without pulling the connector ring of the coupling to see whether or not the handpiece was removed from the coupling.Nakanishi did not observe the handpiece removal as reported by the user.C) nakanishi supplied the handpiece with air with the manufacturer's recommended pressure (0.3mpa) and stopped supplying repeatedly to replicate the reported phenomenon.Separation of the handpiece from the coupling was not observed during the test.D) nakanishi evaluated pull length of the handpiece by pulling the handpiece from the coupling using force specified in the specifications (100n or greater).The handpiece did not separate from the coupling.E) nakanishi conducted a visual inspection of the handpiece and coupling and observed that the joints of the handpiece and coupling were slightly soiled and that foreign materials were attached on the handpiece and coupling.F) nakanishi took photographs of all the disassembled parts and kept them in the investigation report no.(b)(4).Conclusions reached based on the investigation and analysis results: a) nakanishi could not identify the exact cause of the handpiece separating from the coupling because nakanishi was not able to replicate the phenomenon during testing and did not observe any abnormalities in the visual inspection.B) in spite of the fact that nakanishi did not identify the cause, nakanishi considers the possibility from many years of experience in the lock release direction by external factors or that the connection was temporarily unstable due to foreign materials.C) carelessness by the user causes erroneous operation leading to the reported handpiece separation.D) in order to prevent a recurrence of the handpiece separation from the coupling, nakanishi took the following actions: d.1) nakanishi reviewed the operation manual and reconfirmed the clarity and understandability of the instructions.D.2) nakanishi will report the above evaluation results to the dentist and remind the dentist of the importance o0f using the device as instructed in the operation manual.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NSK
Type of Device
HANDPIECE, AIR-POWERED, DENTAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA  322-8666
Manufacturer (Section G)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA   322-8666
Manufacturer Contact
sean kaufman
1800 global parkway
hoffman estates, IL 60192
2245128921
MDR Report Key17569570
MDR Text Key321402058
Report Number9611253-2023-00051
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EFB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberEOM TITANIUM TURBINE X-SL
Device Catalogue NumberP496003
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/28/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/17/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/10/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/20/2008
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age59 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceAsian
-
-