This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned or that a death or serious injury occurred; nor is it admission that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional, relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned or that a death or serious injury occurred; nor is it admission that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
An additional catheter was returned to cook with the complaint device.A device label was also returned indicating that the second catheter also had a hole.This information was initially captured in report 1820334-2023-01398.However, after further review of the reported information, it was determined the complaint devices and events are identical.Therefore, the two devices will be captured in this report.
|
D2a - additional common name: gbo catheter, nephrostomy, general & plastic surgery; lje catheter, nephrostomy.D2b - additional product code: gbo, lje.G4 - pma/510(k) #: k173035.Investigation ¿ evaluation: on 14aug2023, an issue was reported with a ultrathane mac-loc locking loop multipurpose drainage catheter.During insertion procedure prior to patient contact, a hole was discovered.The patient reportedly experienced no adverse effects as a result of this incident.Reviews of the documentation, including the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu) and quality control procedures, as well as a visual inspection and functional test of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.Two prior to use catheters were received for evaluation.One catheter was cut below the hub.A functional test confirmed leakage in both catheters.When the hub was removed from the cut catheter, a hole was noted 4mm below the flare.On the uncut catheter, a hole was found at the bottom edge of the cap when bending the catheter shaft.It was concluded that both catheters were manufactured out of specification.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient controls are in place to detect this failure mode prior to release.A review of the device history record (dhr) for the device lot found no related nonconformances.It should be noted that there was one additional complaint associated with the final product lot for the same failure.Related lots were put on stop-ship.Field action was considered but determined not to be necessary.Cook was also able to review product labeling.Instructions for use (ifu) document (b)(4) is packaged with this device.The product ifu states the following in consideration of the reported failure mode: ¿how supplied: upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ evidence gathered upon review of the dhr and returned device suggests that the device was manufactured out of specification and that there are possible nonconforming devices in house or out in the field.Containment was performed on the complaint lot, but field action was determined not to be necessary.Based on the information provided, examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, it was determined that a quality control deficiency contributed to the reported event.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|