• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1808061
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Fungal Infection (2419)
Event Date 06/21/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that seven months sixteen days post port placement for administration of total parenteral nutrition in treatment of gastroparesis, the patient was diagnosed with infection.However, the current status of the patent is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 06/2022).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that six months and twenty-nine days post a port placement via the left internal jugular vein in the atriocaval junction, the patient allegedly developed with candida albicans fungal infection as a result of the defective infected catheter.Reportedly, the entire port and catheter were removed intact.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.The medical record states that implanted port was placed in a patient after diagnosis of severe gastroparesis and the fluoroscopy confirmed the port placement.Approximately after twelve months later, blood culture shows the positivity sign of gram-positive cocci staph infection not staph aureus and the patient allegedly developed with bacteremia as a result of the defective infected catheter.Three days later, removal of right chest port-a-cath was undertaken due to the clinical indication bacteremia.The removal of port and catheter was taken placed by removing the port from the port pocket under the skin and the catheter tubing was also removed intact.After approximately seven months later, another bard implantable port placement was made by implanting the port at the atriocaval junction with the help of fluoroscopic guidance through the left internal jugular vein approach.The placed port was aspirated and flushed with heparinized saline.Approximately after another seven months later, port removal was undertaken due to infection, and the inserted port and catheter was removed completely.A month later through the right internal jugular vein approach, another bard implantable port was placed in the atriocaval junction without any difficulty for a patient after being diagnosed with severe gastroparesis.The port was aspirated and flushed with heparinized saline.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence for the reported deficiency with the port in the submitted medical record review.Additionally, it can be confirmed that the patient developed fungal infection.However, the relationship to the port is unknown.Furthermore, the clinical condition alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 06/2022).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that six months and twenty-nine days post a port placement via the left internal jugular vein in the atriocaval junction, the patient allegedly developed with candida albicans fungal infection as a result of the defective infected catheter.Reportedly, the entire port and catheter were removed intact.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key17593803
MDR Text Key321620372
Report Number3006260740-2023-03600
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741027048
UDI-Public(01)00801741027048
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K063377
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/25/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1808061
Device Lot NumberREEW1079
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/27/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/22/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/12/2024
04/25/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/08/2024
04/30/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age27 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-