C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT SLIM IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, KIT, 6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 1716070J |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Material Deformation (2976); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
|
Event Date 07/26/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f products is identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 09/2024).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, the tip of the dilator was allegedly damaged.Reportedly, patient experienced tissue damaged.The current status of the patient is reported to be stable.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, the tip of the dilator was allegedly damaged.Reportedly, patient experienced tissue damaged.The current status of the patient is reported to be stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f products is identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one vessel dilator was returned for evaluation.Gross visual and microscopic evaluation were performed.The vessel dilator was noted to be bent and the distal tip of the vessel dilator was noted to be jagged and fractured.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported deformation due to compressive stress and identified fracture issue.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 09/2024), g3.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f products is identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one vessel dilator was returned for evaluation.Gross visual and microscopic evaluation were performed.The distal tip of the vessel dilator was noted to be jagged and fractured.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported dilator damage and fracture issue was identified upon evaluation.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 09/2024).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, the tip of the dilator was allegedly damaged.Reportedly, patient experienced tissue damaged.The current status of the patient is reported to be stable.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|