C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT TI ISP, 8 FR CHRONOFLEX, SUTURE PLUG, SL; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 1708060 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Bacterial Infection (1735); Rash (2033)
|
Event Date 06/12/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately one month post power port placement, the patient allegedly had a systemic reaction to the port.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced a generalized rash from head to toe and an infected port.Reportedly, the port was removed, and the catheter tip was sent for culture, where it grew klebsiella.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.The information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately one month post port placement, the patient allegedly had a systemic reaction to the port.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced a generalized rash from head to toe and an infected port.Reportedly, the port was removed, and the catheter tip was sent for culture, where it grew klebsiella.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records was performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: d4 (expiry date: (b)(6) 2024), g3 h11: d1, d4, h6 (method) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately one month post port placement, the patient allegedly had a systemic reaction to the port.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced a generalized rash from head to toe and an infected port.Reportedly, the port was removed, and the catheter tip was sent for culture, where it grew klebsiella.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately one month post power port placement, the patient allegedly had a systemic reaction to the port.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced a generalized rash from head to toe and an infected port.Reportedly, the port was removed, and the catheter tip was sent for culture, where it grew klebsiella.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|