• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT TI ISP, 8 FR CHRONOFLEX, SUTURE PLUG, SL; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT TI ISP, 8 FR CHRONOFLEX, SUTURE PLUG, SL; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1708060
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bacterial Infection (1735); Rash (2033)
Event Date 06/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately one month post power port placement, the patient allegedly had a systemic reaction to the port.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced a generalized rash from head to toe and an infected port.Reportedly, the port was removed, and the catheter tip was sent for culture, where it grew klebsiella.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.The information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately one month post port placement, the patient allegedly had a systemic reaction to the port.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced a generalized rash from head to toe and an infected port.Reportedly, the port was removed, and the catheter tip was sent for culture, where it grew klebsiella.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records was performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: d4 (expiry date: (b)(6) 2024), g3 h11: d1, d4, h6 (method) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately one month post port placement, the patient allegedly had a systemic reaction to the port.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced a generalized rash from head to toe and an infected port.Reportedly, the port was removed, and the catheter tip was sent for culture, where it grew klebsiella.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately one month post power port placement, the patient allegedly had a systemic reaction to the port.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced a generalized rash from head to toe and an infected port.Reportedly, the port was removed, and the catheter tip was sent for culture, where it grew klebsiella.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPORT TI ISP, 8 FR CHRONOFLEX, SUTURE PLUG, SL
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key17630476
MDR Text Key322026792
Report Number3006260740-2023-03714
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741026621
UDI-Public(01)00801741026621
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K072215
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician Assistant
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1708060
Device Lot NumberREGV1266
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/01/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/28/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/19/2023
10/20/2023
10/25/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/16/2023
10/23/2023
11/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/13/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age52 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-